# TON: Too Big To Ignore

Source: https://4pillars.io/en/articles/ton-too-big-to-ignore
Kiwi News: https://news.kiwistand.com/stories/TON-Too-Big-To-Ignore?index=0x66ffcadbbdb180bd739cd7d13c529aa66aee17cceacf11e7cf8a95776b67008bbb2bf7a5
Submitted by tim on 2024-10-04 UTC, 4 upvotes, 3 comments

## Comments

**tim**: Cool. You know what else is too big to ignore about TON? It's FDV to Marketcap difference. 

Only 50% of all coins have been sent into circulation. I almost feel like this article is intentionally hiding this fact from the reader to shill the coin. 

Using Readwise Reader, this article is a 30min read, yet when I Ctrl-F for "unlocks" or whatever, there's no mention of token unlocks but a whole lot of shilling to suggest how incredibly interesting TON's ecosystem model is.

This is bad. I think KOLs need to stop this way of shilling. You're not fooling us anymore and it is increasingly coming across as dishonest if the most fundamental attribute of a token is left out, it's unlock schedule.

How about this: Write a blog post but focus it on unlock schedules and give investors a clear idea if the token is worth putting some money in or not based on the unlock dynamics.

**qiaoliang.eth**: Telegram as a distribution channel is more interesting than TON.

**tim**: Agreed, but I‘d love to be able to invest in Telegram because I like its product, and TON would be an amazing choice as a proxy if the FDV ratio was acceptable