Academic Paper: Why Academics Are Leaving Twitter for Bluesky

Submit
arxiv.org

Academic Paper: Why Academics Are Leaving Twitter for Bluesky

AI summary of the linked article

Researchers Dorian Quelle, Frederic Denker, Prashant Garg and Alexandre Bovet report that scholar migration from Twitter/X to Bluesky is driven by peer influence, with simple rather than complex contagion. They linked 276,431 scholars on Twitter/X to their new profiles among 16.7 million Bluesky accounts, tracked from January 2023 to December 2024. Using Brazil's court-ordered suspension of Twitter/X as exogenous variation, they find treatment effects are short-lived and dose-dependent. Adoption concentrates among users deeply embedded in Twitter's social graph, public political expression predicts migration, and early reconnection with prior contacts predicts longer tenure on Bluesky.

Recommended by 4 curators
avatar
I asked o3 to summarize the paper:

* Tracked about 276 000 academics from 2023-2025.
* Roughly 1 in 5 opened a Bluesky account and stopped tweeting; split by field: ~31 % in arts & humanities vs ~13 % in medicine.
* Biggest predictor is whether the accounts you read migrate. If 10 % of your followees leave, your own chance of quitting jumps about ten-fold compared with losing the same share of followers.
* Five flashpoints caused most exits:

1. July 2023 global X outage
2. July 2023 “rate-limit” fee talk
3. Feb 2024 Bluesky public launch
4. Aug 2024 one-day X block in Brazil
5. Post-election rush after the Nov 2024 US vote
* Re-creating your old Twitter reading list on Bluesky makes you stay active; failing to do so means you often drift away.
* Political tweeters leave in a steady trickle; non-political scholars mainly bolt during the big shocks.
* Citation counts, h-index, and “top-100 author” status have no effect on who quits.

TL;DR: Academics move when the voices they rely on disappear—especially during Twitter/X hiccups—and they stick with Bluesky only if they can rebuild that feed.

avatar
Is there an academic vibe there, where people are talking about their research etc? That sounds like something I would check out. If its just academics spouting of politics, it sounds like the worst network in the world.