Submit an article
youtu.be
SIGN HERE TO LOSE EVERYTHING - Rekt Security Summit
by rvolz.eth1211 🥝 • 4h
1
avatar
rvolz.eth • 4h ago
> In the early days of crypto, people lost funds through exchanges. Then once exchanges matured and DeFi became popular, through smart contract exploits. Smart contract security...
@cosmoquestX
@cosmoquestX

There are now 10 toilets in Space International Space Station: 4 Crew Dragon Docked at ISS: 1 Soyuz Docked at ISS: 1 Tiangong Space Station: 2 Shenzhou Docked at TSS: 1 Artemis II on way around Moon: 1 This will be the first time a toilet has left low earth orbit!

x.com
by mishaderidder.eth11953 🥝 • 9h • firefly.social
substack.com
Fever Dream of Exotic Topologies
by mishaderidder.eth11953 🥝 • 11h
My self-sovereign / local / private / secure LLM setup, April 2026
by timdaub.eth11865 🥝 • 12h • eth.limo
@Celo
@Celo

After much consideration

Tweet image
x.com
by timdaub.eth11865 🥝 • 1d • x.com
1
avatar
mishaderidder.eth • 1d ago
interesting, wonder which L2 will follow
systematiclongshort.com
Crypto Is A Bet On Humanity's Ceaseless Desire For Progress
by rvolz.eth1211 🥝 • 1d
1
avatar
timdaub.eth • 1d ago
Wow! This is the first fully logical and optimistic take on AI and crypto that I‘ve read so far. And the fact that nobody has built AI into a wallet to serve this exact use case is...
@Eli5defi
@Eli5defi

If you’ve ever said “quantum is decades away,” today’s news should make you pause. Google just published a paper suggesting a quantum computer could crack a Bitcoin private key in ~9 minutes, potentially moving the quantum timeline up to 2029. The thing is: that machine doesn’t exist yet. But the distance between “theoretical” and “practical” just shrank fast, and a lot of wallet hygiene that feels fine today is dangerously wrong for where this is going. The threat isn’t quantum mining. It’s quantum signatures. Bitcoin’s Proof-of-Work is fine. SHA-256 is fine. The soft spot is ECDSA, the signature scheme that proves you own your coins. Shor’s algorithm doesn’t brute-force keys. It solves the underlying math. Three realistic attack paths: 1) On-spend Watch a transaction in the public mempool, derive the private key, then front-run it with a forged transaction and a higher fee before confirmation. Some estimates put success around ~41% under current assumptions. 2) At-rest Target dormant wallets where the public key is already exposed. No time pressure. Works with weaker quantum hardware. 3) On-setup Crack setup parameters once, then turn it into a permanent classical exploit. Think Tornado Cash–style setups, and even Ethereum’s KZG data availability layer. Who’s exposed right now: - ~6.9M BTC may already be vulnerable across script types - Any address you’ve spent from has its public key permanently on-chain - Taproot (bc1p) exposes your public key the moment you receive funds And the part that changes the timeline: - Older estimates: ~9M physical qubits to break Bitcoin - Google’s newer circuits: under ~500K (about a 20x reduction) So yes, the computer isn’t here yet. But this is looking less like a physics problem and more like an engineering schedule. What to do now: - Stop reusing addresses - Avoid bc1p for cold storage if you’re optimizing for long-term quantum risk - Audit which wallets have already exposed public keys --- Eli5 Interactive research here: https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/ff56f…

Tweet image
x.com
by rvolz.eth1211 🥝 • 1d • x.com
Image Empire
by mishaderidder.eth11953 🥝 • 2d • co.uk
3
previous participantprevious participant
Previous in thread
avatar
timdaub.eth • 1d ago
Philosophically there is anyways the question how NPC is less agentic as eg being a Player. Eg it used to be that Thrall, the chief of the orgs in WoW was actually a really cool...
sceneswithsimon.com
How to Be Illegible In The Age of Slop
by mishaderidder.eth11953 🥝 • 2d
1
avatar
rvolz.eth • 1d ago
That reference to "What's He Building?" is so cool.
validategnosis.com
Gnosis Chain — Fusaka Hard Fork Announcement
by mishaderidder.eth11953 🥝 • 7h
kazani@kazani

AI-assisted vulnerability discovery seems to be making bug finding much cheaper and more scalable: https://lwn.net/Articles/1065620/ We're about to learn whether AI-scale vulnerability discovery leads to more real-world compromise, or instead forces the kernel to patch faster and improve overall security.

farcaster.xyz
by @kazani350 🥝 • 9h • farcaster.xyz
HomeNewSubmit