How Denmark’s Welfare State Became a Surveillance Nightmare
AI summary of the linked articleDenmark's Public Benefits Administration has built an extensive data-mining system to detect welfare fraud, which the human rights group Justitia describes as mass surveillance. Annika Jacobsen, who heads the agency's data mining unit, argues that the algorithms only flag people for review by a human investigator, and that the agency's data use is proportional under European data protection laws. Documents obtained by Lighthouse Reports and WIRED show that Denmark's algorithms use variables including nationality, marital status and a "presumed partner" measure to identify possible concealed relationships. Of the nearly 50,000 cases selected in 2022, 8 percent resulted in some form of punishment. |
1 comment Interesting article! This is a controversial topic, and I think the viewpoint expressed here is somewhat unilateral. I live in Denmark, so I know what it is like to live in this system day to day. There is no public surveillance in the obvious sense, like people being afraid to talk openly about and criticise the government. Freedom of speech and liberal values are part of the Constitution of Denmark. And there are huge benefits in the Danish society. There is a lot of unemployment aid, parental aid, lots of tax subsidies depending on your social state. But on the other hand, there is a lot of tax (up to around 60%!) and services are 2 or 3 times more expensive than in a lot of countries in Europe. It would be unfair for the tax payers if people could easily cheat the system and receive benefits that they are not entitled to. That is why some sort of control is required, to make sure that people respect the law. Some of the ways this is achieved, is perhaps on the grey zone constitutionally, and should be publicly known and debated. While people lean more on the left or on the right, I think the debate should lie in the middle, and open the dialogue between the 2 sides, on how they can maintain a welfare society without infringing on people's right to privacy and free speech. |
More from wired.com on Kiwi News
|