Maybe Bluesky has “won”
Maybe Bluesky has won by mishaderidder.eth13109 🥝 • 2y • 0 views • 0 clicks | |
AI summary of the linked articleThe author argues that Bluesky is not yet federated or decentralized, despite being credited as such, though the team is working toward decentralization. Bluesky runs on the AT Protocol, whose Personal Data Servers can be self-hosted for about $15 a month, but the Relays needed to index them require around 4.5 TB of disk space, and the only App View reading PDSs is the one Bluesky controls. DIDs using the PLC method, and DMs, also remain under Bluesky's control. The author also cites domain-based usernames, composable moderation and starter packs as strengths, and says Bluesky may "win" while staying open to change. | |
Recommended by 3 curators | |
Honestly, Bluesky has won because it hasn‘t asked users to create a stupid private key wallet. And now that Passkeys are being rolled out, it seems they‘re on track to integrate those too. And FC is going to become an extension of the crypto casino. Sad that this is what crypto incentivized. One would think there are many alternative use cases for social networks with strong private keys. One can only hope! Regarding this, what do you think of this post by dwr: https://news.kiwistand.com/stories/dwr.eth:-decentralized-social-network-has-been-terrible-framing-for-Farcaster?index=0x673f22dc2473d37b287c47957f2466b889b45a3fbc269518ed89f0d4c3118e4a81001136 | |
Characters remaining: 10,000 comment guidelines | |
