NFT Storage: Comparing IPFS, Filecoin, and Arweave
NFT storage: Comparing IPFS, Filecoin, and Arweave by mishaderidder.eth13093 🥝 • 2y • 0 views • 0 clicks | |
AI summary of the linked articleThe article explains how IPFS, Filecoin, and Arweave differ as alternatives to fully onchain NFT storage, with each relying on different trust assumptions. IPFS is a peer-to-peer file system where data stays available only if nodes choose to pin it, often through services like ClubNFT or Pinata. Filecoin adds FIL-based incentives and storage deals that must be renewed over time, and the Museum of Crypto Art is cited as a user. Arweave offers a one-time upfront fee meant to fund permanent storage through an endowment, with projects such as Manifold and Irys building on it. | |
Recommended by 3 curators | |
Curating this companion piece with this newer article: | |
Characters remaining: 10,000 comment guidelines | |
