Spring Festival Gala Robots Went Viral. But The Takes Are Wrong.

Spring Festival Gala Robots Went Viral. But The Takes Are Wrong.x.com
Spring Festival Gala Robots Went Viral. But The Takes Are Wrong.
by rvolz.eth1470 ๐Ÿฅ โ€ข 8mo
AI summary of the linked article

The author argues that China's viral robot demonstrations at the Spring Festival Gala owe their rapid progress to manufacturing infrastructure rather than government planning or subsidies. Describing the Gala's robots' stunts, the piece says China shipped 90% of the roughly 13,000 humanoid robots sold globally last year, with Unitree's G1 priced at $16,000 against Tesla's Optimus Gen2 at over $20,000. The author describes a US research team that stopped experiments after three Unitree robots broke, citing slow shipping and repairs, and says a dense supply chain in Shenzhen and Shanghai lets teams iterate cheaply. The piece concludes that the US should build domestic industrial infrastructure, not rely on immigration or talent.

Recommended by 1 curator
avatar
Agree w/ this, Chinese have the production capacity to built fast - they have been producing almost anything for the West past decades! Not said, China being authoritarian, decisions are quickly made, short lines between idea and creation. Obviously some pros to that ;) Esthetically find the robots bit gloomy, more darth vader than C-3PO. It might be the absence of faces.
avatar
Talking about robot esthetics lol https://aubr.ai/ ๐Ÿ‘€
avatar
Agreed, the robot aesthetics currently seem to be split between the faceless men (China, US) trying to avoid the uncanny valley and the cheerful Japanese approach, as exemplified in Sunny https://www.wmagazine.com/culture/sunny-rashida-jones-apple-tv-review
Characters remaining: 10,000

comment guidelines