The case against conversational interfaces

Submit
The case against conversational interfacesjulian.digital
julian.digital

The case against conversational interfaces

AI summary of the linked article

The author argues that conversational interfaces are unlikely to replace existing computing paradigms because natural language is a slow, lossy data transfer mechanism, and that AI should instead complement current tools as a voice-driven command layer. The article cites typing at about 36 words per minute on mobile and 60 on desktop, and speaking at about 150 words per minute. It describes a voice-based assistant built for StarCraft II at a hackathon, where voice acted as an extra input alongside mouse and keyboard. The author also frames the core idea as a case against zero-sum thinking about AI.

avatar
Not focused on Ethereum, but IMO very important, because I lately saw some projects in crypto romancing with these kind of interfaces. Good to know their limitations.