This Essay Shouldn't Go Viral
This Essay Shouldn't Go Viral by mishaderidder.eth13093 🥝 • 7mo • 0 views • 0 clicks | |
AI summary of the linked articleCulture's middle has eroded as popularity concentrates at the top, and the web should be tempered as the center of our information ecology to restore resilience and dynamism. Supporting data cites music charts where top songs linger longer while the bottom quarter rotates faster, and film box office share held by the top ten movies rising from about 25% in the early 2000s to 45% in 2025. Drawing on antimemes as described in qntm's story and Nadia's book, it argues that group chats are antimemetic publicly but memetic privately. | |
There's a part in this essay where Simon actually blames a lot of the negative things these days on the big public feeds. But I'd actually say that this is probably a wrong conclusion. I think there are other very big mechanical things at play in the world, e.g., demographics, migration, fiscal realities, that have way bigger impact on how people in those societies feel than public feeds. E.g. Germany's economic decline was somewhat inevitable given its demographics and no Facebook or other platform should be blamed for this. It's been mostly a mechanical thing that just played out the way it was always predicted to. I think the polarization that we see e.g. on feeds about this issue is a symptom (again, practically inevitable) with people feeling the decline in their own lifes and voicing concerns and frustrations online. The polarizations are visible on the feeds, but they happen because the system is in decline, not because the people have been driven mad by the feed. | |
Characters remaining: 10,000 comment guidelines | |
