@jchaskin22: Farcaster moderation rules don't conflict with CROPS
AI summary of the linked articleJchaskin22 argues that Farcaster's moderation rules do not conflict with support for CROPS, the open, censorship-resistant network principles he wants the underlying protocol to keep. He compares Farcaster's rules to the ethresearch forum's ban on shitposting, calling such rules reasonable as long as moderators do not use their position to suppress ideas. He states that applying new rules to old posts is fair to criticize, while the app's rules should not determine whether users can participate in the underlying network. He says he personally likes the direction of the new social contract that @balajis is making explicit. |
1 comment there is absolutely no problem with moderation on a social platform. who wants bots, shitposters and aggression? but looking at the accounts that were banned by the ns it seems quite clear they’re also banning based on if you are aligned with the ns ideology. that’s not moderation, but censorship. |
More from x.com on Kiwi News
|