@jchaskin22: Farcaster moderation rules don't conflict with CROPS

Submit
@jchaskin22
@jchaskin22

Some quick thoughts on people asking how I can support crops and be excited about the changes to @farcaster_xyz Farcaster (the app) has always had moderation and a social contract. @dwr talked about moderation from the beginning. Having rules for an app doesn’t inherently conflict with free speech or censorship resistance We don’t allow shitposting on ethresearch. It’s a space for Ethereum research, and moderation helps keep it useful. That’s reasonable. If the mods started banning research about MEV because they personally didn’t think MEV was a problem, that would be a different story. They’d be using their position to suppress ideas within the discussion the forum is supposed to support I’m directionally for apps experimenting with rules and algorithms that make conversations more productive. We already have algorithms deciding what gets attention, based on what keeps us scrolling. I want people trying other approaches @balajis is changing Farcaster’s social contract and making it explicit. That doesn’t automatically make every rule or moderation decision good. Applying new rules to old posts is a fair thing to criticize. People wrote those posts under different expectations, and signing something today doesn’t erase that But Farcaster being built on an open, decentralized protocol matters here. The app’s moderation rules shouldn’t determine whether you can participate in the underlying network. You should be able to use or build another client with different rules and keep your identity, following, and history. That needs to work in practice, too That’s where my support for CROPS comes in. I want the underlying network to remain open and censorship resistant so different communities can exist on it. I don’t need every app on that network to have the same moderation policy, or to accept every kind of post Personally, I like the direction of the new social contract. I’ve always found the Network State and techno-optimism interesting without agreeing with everything involved. I’m interested in a social app that rewards building, teaching, and disagreeing productively I want to write a full post about this, but I’m starting my travels to India. See you soon @JoinEdgeCity @EFDevcon

x.com

@jchaskin22: Farcaster moderation rules don't conflict with CROPS

AI summary of the linked article

Jchaskin22 argues that Farcaster's moderation rules do not conflict with support for CROPS, the open, censorship-resistant network principles he wants the underlying protocol to keep. He compares Farcaster's rules to the ethresearch forum's ban on shitposting, calling such rules reasonable as long as moderators do not use their position to suppress ideas. He states that applying new rules to old posts is fair to criticize, while the app's rules should not determine whether users can participate in the underlying network. He says he personally likes the direction of the new social contract that @balajis is making explicit.

avatar
there is absolutely no problem with moderation on a social platform. who wants bots, shitposters and aggression? but looking at the accounts that were banned by the ns it seems quite clear they’re also banning based on if you are aligned with the ns ideology. that’s not moderation, but censorship.