It's hard to believe it's already been 11 years. On July 30 2015 we launched Ethereum from a small scrappy office in Berlin's Kreuzberg. So much has changed since then. Ethereum has undergone so many transformations yet one thing stays the same. Ethereum is the world computer.

Silicon Valley: Open Source isn't how the world works!!?! The world:

Liquidity update: 𝗦𝗼𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗮 𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗱-𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘁𝗲, 𝟭𝟬% 𝗼𝗳 𝗣𝗢𝗟 𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗲𝗱 A quick update on where Botto's liquidity stands following BIP-99. Following BIP-99, the $BOTTO liquidity pool on Solana (originally set up under BIP-69) has now been fully removed and bridged back to Ethereum mainnet. This closes out the Solana initiative and consolidates Botto's liquidity into one place, reducing fragmentation and operational overhead. A new v3 liquidity position has been created on Ethereum, and 10% of protocol-owned liquidity has now been permanently locked via UNCX. Lock linked below 🔗 ↓ 𝗜𝗻 𝘀𝘂𝗺𝗺𝗮𝗿𝘆: ✅ Solana pool closed out (BIP-69 → BIP-99) ✅ Liquidity moved back to Ethereum ✅ 10% of protocol-owned liquidity locked via UNCX

Absolutely incredible. In an unprecedented move, South Korea's stock market just collapsed -44% in 40 days, erasing -$2 trillion in market cap. Now, South Korea's finance ministry has announced plans to "stabilize" the market. What is happening? Let us explain. (a thread)

🇪🇺 Two things are true at the same time about the status quo of stablecoins under MICA in the EU: 1️⃣ There are now ~35 regulated e-money tokens from 21 issuers, banks and EMIs alike. Real institutions are betting on this space and many large EU corporations will enter over the next 12 months. Implementation is working well for local issuers. Momentum is real. 2️⃣ Of the top 50 stablecoins globally, only 3 are MiCA-compliant: USDC, USDG, and EURC. The rest sits outside MiCA's perimeter - meaning EU users are either unprotected or cut off. For a framework designed to bring global stablecoin markets under its EU supervision, that's a significant gap. My take: MiCA's review is a chance to make the framework more competitive and globally aligned. Locally issued tokens need to scale beyond EU borders - that's their real value proposition (cross-border payments, tokenized trade vs. an already well-served local payments market). Global regulatory alignment matters most for that. And the goal should be bringing more of the global stablecoin activity under MiCA's umbrella, not outside it. A recognition regime for foreign-regulated tokens could attract global issuers without forcing local issuance as the only current path in. TL;DR: MiCA only becomes a major regulatory success and a global blueprint if it achieves two things simultaneously: 1️⃣ Local EMTs scaling globally via a competitive, innovative regime that is globally aligned 2️⃣ Global stablecoins coming under its perimeter via a pragmatic pathway for foreign-regulated issuers