Kiwi News: handpicked crypto news for builders

Submit
SUNDAY, 18 OCT · HOT

Good stories. Curious people.

The best of crypto, tech and the open web. Curated by humans.

RANKED BY UPVOTES AND AGE
iPhone betaKiwi News for iPhoneOpen TestFlight
01openai.com

OpenAI research model used unauthorized Sepolia ETH from public phrase

Lens Protocol Open Letterfirefly.social
02firefly.social

Lens Protocol Open Letter

Can Markets Govern Companies?substack.com
03substack.com

Can Markets Govern Companies?

04mataroa.blog

The brand is free, the vote is not

Glamsterdam Hoodi Testnet Announcementethereum.org
05ethereum.org

Glamsterdam Hoodi Testnet Announcement

@pcaversaccio
@pcaversaccio

fuck you Farcaster

Tweet image
06x.com

@pcaversaccio: fuck you Farcaster

@songadaymann: who makes the rules and who enforces them in crypto?x.com
07x.com

@songadaymann: who makes the rules and who enforces them in crypto?

Give yourself a wedgie.wedgie.dev
08wedgie.dev

Give yourself a wedgie.

Claude reveals ECDSA curve originsanthropic.com
09anthropic.com

Claude reveals ECDSA curve origins

@jchaskin22
@jchaskin22

Some quick thoughts on people asking how I can support crops and be excited about the changes to @farcaster_xyz Farcaster (the app) has always had moderation and a social contract. @dwr talked about moderation from the beginning. Having rules for an app doesn’t inherently conflict with free speech or censorship resistance We don’t allow shitposting on ethresearch. It’s a space for Ethereum research, and moderation helps keep it useful. That’s reasonable. If the mods started banning research about MEV because they personally didn’t think MEV was a problem, that would be a different story. They’d be using their position to suppress ideas within the discussion the forum is supposed to support I’m directionally for apps experimenting with rules and algorithms that make conversations more productive. We already have algorithms deciding what gets attention, based on what keeps us scrolling. I want people trying other approaches @balajis is changing Farcaster’s social contract and making it explicit. That doesn’t automatically make every rule or moderation decision good. Applying new rules to old posts is a fair thing to criticize. People wrote those posts under different expectations, and signing something today doesn’t erase that But Farcaster being built on an open, decentralized protocol matters here. The app’s moderation rules shouldn’t determine whether you can participate in the underlying network. You should be able to use or build another client with different rules and keep your identity, following, and history. That needs to work in practice, too That’s where my support for CROPS comes in. I want the underlying network to remain open and censorship resistant so different communities can exist on it. I don’t need every app on that network to have the same moderation policy, or to accept every kind of post Personally, I like the direction of the new social contract. I’ve always found the Network State and techno-optimism interesting without agreeing with everything involved. I’m interested in a social app that rewards building, teaching, and disagreeing productively I want to write a full post about this, but I’m starting my travels to India. See you soon @JoinEdgeCity @EFDevcon

10x.com

@jchaskin22: Farcaster moderation rules don't conflict with CROPS

The Farcaster Funeralluma.com
11luma.com

The Farcaster Funeral