Formalizing decentralization goals in the context of larger L1 gaslimits

Submit
Formalizing decentralization goals in the context of larger L1 gaslimitsethereum-magicians.org
ethereum-magicians.org

Formalizing decentralization goals in the context of larger L1 gaslimits

AI summary of the linked article

Vitalik Buterin argues that raising the Ethereum L1 gaslimit, and the higher full-node hardware and bandwidth requirements that come with it, is likely a net good, and that Ethereum needs a clearer framework for its decentralization goals before doing so. He proposes three node types: light nodes that verify the chain and are easy enough to include in default wallets, medium nodes with an n/2-of-n trust assumption such as attesters and FOCIL participants, and heavy nodes with a 1-of-n assumption such as block builders and provers. Heavy requirements on block building are expected to be more controversial than those on proving, since a malicious dominant builder can cause harm. He also says bandwidth limits should be more conservative than hardware limits, and that the numbers remain to be filled in.

No comments yetWhat caught your eye? Start the discussion.