Thoughts from EthCC[7]

Submit
x.com

Thoughts from EthCC[7]

AI summary of the linked article

Chain teams often misjudge why block explorers exist, and a custom explorer whose UI, UX and features differ from the industry standard may keep developers from building on the chain. The text claims that teams who understand their scope and focus are most likely to succeed. It also says infrastructure providers and analytics tools get little media and conference coverage because they pay less than high-growth chains, and that sparse participation at too many conferences leaves talks and panels with low attendance. It adds that Etherscan is getting paid six figures for an explorer, though it claims 99% of people don't know chains pay for explorers.

Recommended by 2 curators
avatar
Thank you for this real take! This is pretty bearish though! But I think you‘re saying the truth.

It is kinda crazy that there are a bazillion side events with empty chairs and this should make people pause and think whether their investments into these projects are wisely placed. At the end of the day this is your money you want a return on!

And to connect the dots, just the other week we had Polkadot make headlines about their deranged marketing budget, and then this week it‘s EthCC.
Yeah but I don’t necessarily think it’s bearish. The insight I get from this is that events should be fewer, and with more quality. And also, nearer to the main venue: most were very far..