@polynya: USDC on Ethereum adds intermediaries, making it less decentralized

Submit
polynya@polynya

Well, that didn't take long! I've seen comments about "decentralisation is the goal" - it's not. I'll address it again, though it's just repeating my blog posts from 2023. USDC is issued by Circle, a publicly owned company regulated by government agencies with a set of checks and balances, which are indirectly elected by hundreds of millions of US citizens. By deploying on Ethereum, you make USDC less decentralized by adding additional intermediaries (chiefly a few thousand noderunners) which aren't necessary for a lot of usecases. Ethereum is very centralised, it's just *differently centralised* However, there'll always be usecases where that differential centralisation will be useful. There's also sticky network effects, as we've seen with USDT on Tron. I only care about using the best technology for the job, and for most stablecoin payments, Ethereum or Tron are not it. But there are also certain usecases where they are, like jurisdictions that restrict USDC and access to Ethereum DeFi.

farcaster.xyz

@polynya: USDC on Ethereum adds intermediaries, making it less decentralized

AI summary of the linked article

Polynya argues that deploying USDC on Ethereum makes the stablecoin less decentralized by adding intermediaries, mainly a few thousand node runners, that are unnecessary for many use cases. He says USDC is issued by Circle, a publicly owned company regulated by government agencies, and that Ethereum is very centralized but differently so. He adds that Ethereum or Tron are not the best technology for most stablecoin payments, though they suit some cases, such as jurisdictions that restrict USDC and access to Ethereum DeFi.

Recommended by 1 curator
No comments yetWhat caught your eye? Start the discussion.