> In contrast to other Retro Funding experiments, badgeholders will not vote on individual projects but will rather vote via selecting and weighting a number of metrics which measure different types of impact. Actually, a few people already tried to explain this to me, but reading your article made it finally click for me! That's so interesting and it kinda makes me wonder how we'll do at Kiwi News. Because, for example, we're not doing too bad in the Trusted Optimism MAU/WAU/DAU category :)
It’s pretty cool seeing the (preliminary) data for the (preliminary) metrics. I think projects with loyal communities of real users will do wellv- Of course, that’s after the bachelors to the
whoops, dictation fail Of course that’s up to the badgeholders to decide
This focus on quality users looks very promising. I have one concern here, though. Counting interactions seems to be transaction-focused. This makes sense since the idea is to subsidize projects that generate blockspace demand. However, for Kiwi, the only interactions visible onchain are Kiwipass mints, which show only a tiny part of the bigger picture. Do you think there would be a way to include the Kiwi Protocol interactions somehow?