GIP-153: Should Gnosis Chain transition into the Ethereum Economic Zone?
GIP-153: Should Gnosis Chain transition into the Ethereum Economic Zone? by mishaderidder.eth13107 🥝 • 3mo • | |
AI summary of the linked articleGIP-153 asks GnosisDAO to align on transitioning Gnosis Chain from a standalone Layer 1 into a ZK-proven Ethereum Economic Zone (EEZ) rollup instance that settles natively on Ethereum, replacing its treasury-funded staking subsidy with fees from network activity. The proposal states that Gnosis Chain's original value of credible neutrality did not provide enough differentiation, and that Gnosis dilutes non-stakers by roughly 2.3% a year. The first iteration, targeted for genesis around the turn of 2026/27, gives synchronous composability with Ethereum mainnet and is operated by Gnosis Ltd, with sequencing centralized at launch. No funds are requested; the GIP seeks alignment on direction only. | |
 this reply is actually a good explainer: mkoeppelmann @Bread.Cooperative a view very concrete examples relevant to a project like yours: With EEZ: Anyone with funds on Ethereum can e.g. buy/bake “bread” with a single tx from Ethereum. This tx could directly trigger things on Gnosis (like buying/staking/ bread) So generally you will no longer need a dedicated wallet with xDAI on Gnosis - anything than can be done on Gnosis can directly be done from any mainnet wallet. The same if true for the other direction: Anything that can be done on Ethereum can be done from a Gnosis account. So, e.g. you can hold Bread on Gnosis and with a single tx swap this into another asset on Ethereum and send this asset (lets say USDC to e.g. any CEX or offramp service that accepts USDC on Ethereum) More examples: you can read any price oracle on Ethereum directly from Gnosis. You can use protocols (e.g. register a name) on ENS or .wei again, directly from a Gnosis wallet. | |
Characters remaining: 10,000 comment guidelines | |