The Goldilocks consensus problem
AI summary of the linked articleFarcaster has developed a new consensus model called the deltagraph, which combines blockchains with CRDTs to aim for social-network scale while staying decentralized. The authors say existing federated and blockchain models trade off decentralization against cost and speed: federation is simple but tends toward centralization, while blockchains are slow and expensive for social data. Deltagraphs avoid global ordering by letting deltas merge in any order, and they use rent to limit storage, with Farcaster's blockchain handling payments. The article reports over 300,000 paying users and 1,000 nodes serving 5 million deltas every day. |
Recommended by 3 curators |
3 comments timSubmitter I‘m obviously highly interested in this post, yet the „Goldilocks“ idea is completely meaningless to me as an European, as I found that this is an American fairy tale told to kids. timSubmitter Went straight to the source for that. Is it just me, or why Am I surprised that this story is even a thing? What‘s the second layer interpretation here? - That there‘s a preference for every individual? - That there is nuance between extremes? Don‘t fairy tales usually have much deeper meaning? timSubmitter Ahaaaa, heureka. So the Goldilocks principle is a story about markets and preferences! How cool! |
More from varunsrinivasan.com on Kiwi News |
