We should talk less about public goods funding & more about open source funding
We should talk less about public goods funding and more about open source funding by mishaderidder.eth13093 🥝 • 2y • | |
AI summary of the linked articleVitalik Buterin argues that the term "public goods" has become too easily stretched, with commercial projects describing themselves as "building a public good", and that "open source" is a clearer alternative. He notes that central examples of digital public goods, such as academic blockchain and cryptographic research, documentation and tutorials, and open source software like Ethereum clients, are all open source. He adds that open-sourcing is itself a public good with diffuse benefits, and that open source has a well-agreed definition from the FSF and OSI. He also suggests that for physical goods, such as clean air and defense technology, open source is the most efficient route to global scale. | |
Recommended by 3 curators | |
More Vitalik just published arguing that the focus should shift from public goods to open source to better identify and support initiatives that maximize value for humanity. Also he changed his pfp on Warpcast, Milady no more. | |
Characters remaining: 10,000 comment guidelines | |
