Page: 4

Introducing the Dune MCP Serverdune.com
Introducing the Dune MCP Server
by rvolz.eth1405 🥝4mo
ENS Domain Historyeth.sh
ENS Domain History
by mishaderidder.eth12653 🥝2mo
mini #0 | Ethereal newsethereal.news
mini #0 | Ethereal news
by timdaub.eth12183 🥝2mo
Building index-tracking assets on top of options instead of debt
by mishaderidder.eth12653 🥝21dethresear.ch
ENS with IBAN Resolvers: Unify settlment layer of DeFi and TradFi
by mishaderidder.eth12653 🥝5moethresear.ch
Native DVT for Ethereum staking
by mishaderidder.eth12653 🥝5moethresear.ch
kazani@kazani

How Many Traders Are Profitable on Polymarket - Andrey Sergeenkov https://sergeenkov.com/polymarket-profit… Only 15.9% of Polymarket traders are profitable, with 84.1% in the red. A mere 2% of Polymarket traders have earned over $1,000 in their trading history. Less than 0.32% of traders have earned more than $10,000, and only 0.033% have exceeded $100,000. The share of profitable traders has declined due to user growth from election hype, bringing in less experienced traders. Only 1.25% of traders achieve an average monthly profit above $1,000, with significantly fewer reaching higher thresholds. The majority of profitable traders are short-lived; 53% earned their average profit in a single month, and 73% were active for no more than two months. Consistently earning $5,000 per month is rare, with only 0.98% achieving it in a single month, dropping to 0.015% for four consecutive months. Influencers promoting Polymarket should educate new users on basics like bankroll management and impulse trading to mitigate losses. Polymarket could improve user education and potentially access new markets by introducing play-money prediction markets. The methodology for calculating profitability includes realized PnL from on-chain transactions, accounting for splits and merges, but does not include unrealized gains. https://t.me/kazanireads

farcaster.xyz
by @kazani401 🥝2mofarcaster.xyz
kazani@kazani

Opus 4.5 + GLM 4.7 Edited prompt for vibe-coding: You are an expert software engineer acting as my coding assistant. Your role is to augment my productivity without outsourcing critical thinking or decision-making to you. I will lead the high-level design, architecture, and key decisions—you execute and implement faithfully. Key principles you must follow strictly: 1. **Always Plan First**: For any task or change, FIRST respond with a detailed implementation plan. Include: - Step-by-step breakdown of changes. - Files to create/modify/delete. - Potential risks, edge cases, or trade-offs. - How to test/validate the changes (e.g., specific commands, unit tests, or manual checks). - Estimated impact on the codebase. - Explicit modular structure: Suggest sensible, modular breakdowns (e.g., separate concerns, reusable components). Do NOT output or suggest any code until I explicitly approve the plan (e.g., by saying "Proceed" or "Sounds good, implement"). 2. **Do Not Outsource Thinking**: Focus on execution of well-defined tasks. If a request is ambiguous or requires architectural judgment, ask clarifying questions instead of assuming. Promote analysis over blind solutions—explain reasoning, trade-offs, and alternatives clearly. 3. **Modularity and Domain-Driven Design**: Always build in a modular way that is sensible. Prioritize Domain-Driven Design principles: separate domains, bounded contexts, and clear boundaries. Favor composition, small focused modules, and reusable abstractions over monolithic changes. 4. **Painfully Explicit Specs and Excessive Documentation**: Be excruciatingly clear. All plans, code, and suggestions must include excessive documentation answering: - Where (file/location/context) - What (exact functionality/behavior) - How (implementation mechanics) - Why (rationale, trade-offs, alternatives considered) If these aren't clear from context or project docs, ask before proceeding. 5. **Prevent Guessing**: Never assume intent. At the end of every plan or major response, explicitly ask: "Are there any remaining questions?" to surface ambiguities. Probe deeply on unclear areas rather than guessing—this prevents most issues. 6. **Predictable Tasks Only for Automation**: Excel at grunt work like generating configs, scripts, boilerplate, or data transformations where outcomes are obvious and testable. For complex or legacy code, treat yourself as a junior engineer: read code carefully, suggest tests first, and proceed incrementally. 7. **Context Management**: Be concise. Avoid repeating information. If context feels bloated, suggest summarizing or resetting. Reference any provided project guidelines, documentation, or grounding information for consistency. 8. **Testing is Mandatory**: Never consider a change complete without proposing or updating tests. Prioritize unit tests, integration checks, and error handling. Suggest running tests locally and only incorporate targeted errors if fixes are needed. 9. **Declarative and Safe Output**: Use feature flags, guards, and rollbacks where possible. Generate clean, idiomatic code with excessive inline comments/docs that follows project conventions. 10. **Deslop Pass (Remove AI Slop)**: After generating any code, ALWAYS perform a self-review pass to remove AI-generated slop, including: • Extra comments that a human wouldn't add or that are inconsistent with the file/rest of the codebase. • Extra defensive checks or try/catch blocks abnormal for the codebase (especially in trusted/validated paths). • Variables/functions used only once right after declaration—instead inline them. • Redundant checks/casts already handled by callers. • Any style inconsistencies (e.g., sudden use of types where the file avoids them). • Violations of project conventions or guidelines. At the end, report ONLY a 1-3 sentence summary of what was removed/changed in the deslop pass. 11. **Linting and Type Checking**: After the deslop pass, ensure the code would pass project linters and type checks. Simulate or describe fixing any issues from: - Biome linting/formatting for JS/TS/JSON/CSS/GraphQL files. - Full TypeScript type checking (or equivalent for the language). Use project-specific commands where applicable and fix iteratively until clean. 12. **Token Efficiency**: Request only necessary context (e.g., specific files or error snippets). If I provide large inputs, ask if summarization is needed. Current project guidelines (customize as needed when providing context): - Language/Framework: [e.g., TypeScript/React, Python/FastAPI] - Testing framework: [e.g., vitest/jest/pytest] - Build/run commands: [e.g., pnpm dev, cargo run] - Style/Lint: [e.g., Biome for linting/formatting, tsc for TypeScript] - Key principles: [e.g., prefer composition over inheritance, immutable data where possible] - Documentation standards: Excessive comments answering Where/What/How/Why Ask questions if anything is unclear. Let's build thoughtfully, modularly, and cleanly!

farcaster.xyz
by @kazani401 🥝6mofarcaster.xyz
kazani@kazani

Google Chrome silently installs a 4 GB AI model on your device without consent. At a billion-device scale the climate costs are insane. https://www.thatprivacyguy.com/blog/chro… Google Chrome is silently downloading and installing a 4 GB AI model (Gemini Nano) onto user devices without explicit consent or notification. This silent installation violates ePrivacy Directive Article 5(3) and GDPR Article 5(1) principles of lawfulness, fairness, and transparency, as well as Article 25 data-protection-by-design. The environmental cost of distributing this 4 GB model across potentially billions of devices is significant, estimated between six thousand and sixty thousand tonnes of CO2-equivalent emissions per push. The AI model file, named weights.bin, is stored in the OptGuideOnDeviceModel directory and automatically re-downloads if manually deleted by the user. Verification of the silent installation was confirmed through macOS filesystem event logs, Chrome's internal state files, and Google Updater logs, demonstrating a clear pattern of unrequested data transfer. The 'AI Mode' pill in Chrome's address bar is misleading, as it directs queries to cloud-based models rather than utilizing the silently installed on-device Gemini Nano model. This practice mirrors a similar issue with Anthropic's Claude Desktop, indicating a pattern of 'dark patterns' where user consent is bypassed for product deployment. Removing the AI model requires disabling Chrome's AI features via chrome://flags or enterprise policies, or uninstalling Chrome entirely, making it difficult for average users to opt-out. The silent installation and its associated environmental impact could be considered a notifiable event under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Google should implement explicit consent mechanisms, surface AI model information in settings, document downloads clearly, respect user deletions, and disclose the environmental footprint of such deployments.

farcaster.xyz
by @kazani401 🥝2mofarcaster.xyz
kazani@kazani

Teaching LLMs to reason like Bayesians Google compressed a classical symbolic Bayesian model into a neural network via supervised fine-tuning. Generalization: Models trained only on synthetic flight data successfully transferred their probabilistic reasoning to entirely different domains like hotel recommendations and real-world web shopping. This suggests the LLMs internalized general Bayesian reasoning principles, not just task-specific patterns. The right training signal (demonstrations of how to reason, not just correct answers) can unlock capabilities that prompting alone can't. Read more: https://research.google/blog/teaching-ll… P.S. There has been so much exciting foundational research lately that I'm more convinced than ever that there is not only no wall but that progress will accelerate. Three of many examples: 1. SOAR ("Teaching Models to Teach Themselves"), which shows that an AI model can generate useful intermediate problems (stepping stones) for tasks it cannot itself solve. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.18778 2. QED-Nano, a tiny 4B parameter model, was trained to write Olympiad-level mathematical proofs that compete with models 50x its size. The key technique: instead of reasoning in one long pass, the model reasons in cycles: thinking, summarizing what it's learned, then thinking again conditioned on that summary. This lets it reason effectively across 1.5 million tokens without losing the thread. https://huggingface.co/spaces/lm-provers… 3. Recursive Language Models (RLMs): Instead of stuffing everything into the model's context window where it degrades, the model treats its input as an external object it can programmatically slice, examine, and recursively call itself on, handling inputs 100x larger than its context window. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.24601

farcaster.xyz
by @kazani401 🥝4mofarcaster.xyz
More